ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVOLUTION: ENHANCING MODERN EDUCATION THROUGH ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

Authors

  • Dawood Al-Hamdani Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20266273

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Instructional Model , Zone of Proximal Development , Teacher Professional Role

Abstract

This study examines teachers’ attitudes and readiness to implement an Artificial Intelligence–supported instructional model grounded in the Zone of Proximal Development (AI–ZPD). The proposed model integrates AI-driven personalization, real-time assessment, scaffolding, and collaborative learning to enhance constructivist teaching practices. A sample of 50 teachers completed a survey measuring six attitudinal dimensions: Technology, Pedagogical Alignment, Interaction and Collaboration, Teacher Professional Role and Autonomy, Student Impact, and Assessment Support. Descriptive results indicated moderately positive attitudes across all dimensions (M = 3.10–3.18 on a 5-point scale). Hypotheses testing showed that teachers with prior AI experience demonstrated higher descriptive acceptance of the model, although this difference was not statistically significant. Regression analysis confirmed that demographic variables, including years of experience and prior AI use, did not significantly predict acceptance of the model (F(3,46) = 0.59, p = .63, R² = .04). However, strong positive correlations were found between teachers’ beliefs in student-centred pedagogy, formative assessment, and overall acceptance of the AI–ZPD model (r = .94–.97, p < .001). These results provide robust evidence that pedagogical and assessment beliefs—rather than background factors—are key determinants of teachers’ readiness to adopt AI-supported ZPD-oriented instruction. The study contributes a theoretically grounded AI–ZPD framework and offers practical implications for professional development, policy design, and AI-enhanced teaching and learning.

References

(1) Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002

(2) Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

(3) Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches & issues. Brookline Books.

(4) Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art in AI in education. OECD Education Working Papers, 292, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019

(5) Howard, S. K., Chan, A., & Yang, J. (2019). Teachers’ technology adoption: A research synthesis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5683

Downloads

Published

2026-03-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVOLUTION: ENHANCING MODERN EDUCATION THROUGH ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT APPROACH. (2026). Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 6(2), 438-450. https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20266273