Enhancing Academic Advising Through AI: A Conceptual Model for Furhat Robot Adoption in Higher Education

Authors

  • Jabar H. Yousif Author
  • Mohammed J. Yousif Almutoory Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20255237

Keywords:

Academic advising, AI Academic Advising, Furhat Robot, Advising conceptual model, hybrid AI-human advising

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in post-secondary education is revolutionizing academic advising through accessible, efficient, and tailored help for students. Traditional advising methodologies are inhibited by advisor availability (AA) issues, administrative inefficiencies (AE), language obstacles (LB), and problems related to AI dependability and trust (RT). Through a controlled survey, this study investigates determinants of AI-based academic advising (AP) preference among university students. It develops a new conceptual model that explains AI adoption. The results of hypothesis testing concur with primary relationships: Reduced Advisor Availability (AA) has a significant impact on Administrative Efficiency (AE) (r = 0.772, p < 0.05) and AI augments process flow while reducing human advisor reliance. Moreover, Higher Administrative Efficiency (AE) is directly related to AI Preference (AP) (χ² = 18.32, p = 0.028), implying that students prefer AI if it makes the advising process easier. However, Language Barriers (LB) failed to have any significant impact on AI Preference (p > 0.05), which implies that language access alone cannot help increasing AI adoption. Increased AI Reliability and trust (RT) has a positive influence on AI Preference (AP), and it is critical to ensure reliable, unbiased AI recommendations in academic advising. The new conceptual model integrates these results, proving that AA, AE, LB, and RT make decisions regarding students' AI adoption. Universities can achieve optimal adoption by improving AI reliability, administrative integration, and hybrid AI-human advising designs. Future research must examine long-term adoption trends in AI, cross-cultural variations, and ethical concerns to advance AI-based advising systems for higher education.

References

. Yang, M., Ng, S. K., & Fu, J. (2025). OmniDialog: An Omnipotent Pre-training Model for Task-Oriented Dialogue System. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing.

. Yousif, J. (2021). Social and Telepresence Robots a future of teaching. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 1(1), 58-65.

. Yousif, J. H., & Saini, D. K. (2020). Big data analysis on smart tools and techniques. In Cyber Defense Mechanisms (pp. 111-130). CRC Press.

. Yousif, J. H., Saini, D. K., & Uraibi, H. S. (2011, July). Artificial intelligence in e-leaning-pedagogical and cognitive aspects. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 6-8).

. Yousif, J. H., Zia, K., & Srivastava, D. (2022). Solutions Using Machine Learning for Diabetes. Healthcare Solutions Using Machine Learning and Informatics, 39-59.

. Yousif, M. J., & Jiang, X. (2025). A Human-Robot Interaction in Education: A Systematic Review of Furhat Robots Role in Student Learning. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 337-352.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Enhancing Academic Advising Through AI: A Conceptual Model for Furhat Robot Adoption in Higher Education. (2025). Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20255237